An analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of realist, neoliberal and Essay

An analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of realist, neoliberal and social constructivist approach on European integration and European security - Essay ExampleFirstly, the end of the Cold state of war would increase relative gains concerns among the European states, creating barriers to cooperation. Secondly, institutions could not overcome this barrier to cooperation. (Smith, 2000, p.40). In Mearsheimers view internationalistic institutions were merely an intervening variable in the process by which the balance of power mechanism leads to war (Mearsheimer, 1995a, p.13).Neorealist Joseph Grieco (1995) argued that the successful negotiation of the Treaty on European Union (TEU, 1992) and frugal and Monetary Union (EMU) rebuked the neorealist theory that states hold international institutions in low esteem (Rosamond, 2000, p.133). Further, a more likely explanation of the EUs longevity was the post-Second World War balances of power politics (Rosamond, 2000, p.134). Grieco state d that throughout the last 20 yearsGriecos alternative hypothesis offered a potent explanation for the intensification of European integration in the 1980s/1990s. For Grieco EMU negotiations were an interstate bargain without initial supranational sponsorship. This questions how and why states came to choose the mode of EMU development in the TEU (Rosamond, 2000, p.134).if states share a commonalty interest and secure negotiations on rules constituting a collaborative arrangement, then the weaker but still influential partners will seek to ensure that the rules so constructed will proffer sufficient opportunities for them to voice their concerns and interests and thereby prevent or at least ameliorate their domination by stronger parties. (Grieco, 1995, p.35)The key question for Grieco was why did the EC countries undertake such an ambitious risky, programme of institutional innovation as is envisioned by the Maastricht Treaty, and especially its elements on EMU (Grieco, 1995, p. 23) More specifically, Grieco argued that neorealism faced an acute carry to explain why key middle-rank EU members, particularly France and Italy, decided to join with a potentially hegemonic partner in an economic balancing coalition (Grieco, 1996, p.304).Grieco proffered a revised neorealist argument about secondary states and the interests that might lead them to cooperate with stronger partners through international institutions (1995, p.24). There were economic and policy influence benefits for doing so (Grieco, 1996, p.287). The voice opportunities associated with mesh in institutions offered states a means both to encourage the compliance of stronger partners and to address any unequal distributions of gains which may arise in the course of cooperation (Grieco, 1996, p.288).Grieco believed that neorealism should be amended to designate significance to institutions because the voice opportun